Every submitted Article is automatically recorded in our monitoring system via our online Article processing system. These Articles undergo evaluation by the Editor-in-chief or our staff editors as needed. Articles that meet the initial criteria are then forwarded for external evaluation by peers. Reviewers are bound by confidentiality, unable to share, reproduce, or distribute any content from the Article without the Editor-in-chief's consent. The identity of the reviewer is kept confidential from both the author and other reviewers of the Article. Nonetheless, each peer reviewer will be notified of the decision regarding the Article they have assessed. Authors are obligated to disclose any potential conflicts of interest, including financial, personal, or other that might influence the content. Peer review is a well-established academic practice where your Article is examined by a group of experts in your area, offering feedback on how to enhance the Article or determining its readiness for publication. To ensure a thorough examination of your Article, it is assigned to multiple reviewers, each offering their unique perspectives through a double-blind process. After the proofreading phase and author approval of the final version, it is published in one of our issues, with any significant revisions reflected in Cross Mark and billed to the publisher.