Journal of Advances in Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation

Open Access • Peer Reviewed • Quarterly Publication

Effectiveness of Plyometric Training Versus Pilates Training on Explosive Muscle Strength and Running Performance in Recreational Marathon Runners

Authors: Tanisha Mohanty* , G Swathi, Raghuvamshi, Sowjanya Maruboyina and Maruru Sujeer Basha
Published: 2026-06-10
Pages: 1-6
DOI: 10.63721/26JAPMR0101
View PDFDOI Link

Abstract

Background: Endurance performance in marathon runners depends not only on aerobic conditioning but also on neuromuscular efficiency, muscular power, and postural control. Supplemental exercise programs such as plyometric and Pilates training may improve running economy and athletic performance.

Objective: To compare the effects of plyometric training and Pilates training on explosive muscle strength and running performance in recreational marathon runners.

Methods: A comparative experimental study was conducted among 70 recreational marathon runners aged 18–45 years. Participants were allocated into two intervention groups: plyometric training (n=35) and Pilates training (n=35). Both groups followed supervised training protocols for six weeks. Outcome measures included the 20‑meter sprint test and the 5‑kilometer run test. Statistical analysis was performed using paired and independent t‑tests.

Results: Significant improvement was observed in both groups after intervention (p<0.05). The plyometric training group demonstrated greater improvement in sprint performance and running efficiency compared with the Pilates group. Mean sprint time improved from 3.36±0.12 sec to 3.07±0.12 sec in the plyometric group and from 3.35±0.13 sec to 3.12±0.13 sec in the Pilates group. The 5‑km run performance also improved in both groups.

Conclusion: Both training methods were beneficial for recreational marathon runners; however, plyometric training produced comparatively superior gains in explosive strength and running performance. Pilates training remained effective for improving core stability and movement control.

Copyright & License

© 2026 The Author(s). Published by WM Journals.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Back to Current IssueArchive