Journal of Advanced Intensive and Critical Care Medicine

Open Access • Peer Reviewed • Bi-Monthly Publication

Comparison of Enteral Erythromycin Plus Intravenous Metoclopramide Versus Enteral Erythromycin Alone in Critically Ill Patients with Enteral Feed Intolerance

Authors: Mohd. Ruheel Khan, Madhulika Dubey, Mohd. Mustahsin, Krishna Pratap Mall, Supriya, Ravi Kaushik, Sumit Yadav and Syed Ahmed Hussain Kazmi
Published: 2025-12-19
Pages: 1-13
DOI: 10.63721/25jaicm0108
View PDFDOI Link

Abstract

Background: Early and adequate enteral nutrition in critically ill patients is associated with decreased rate of infection and improved outcomes. However, enteral feed intolerance (EFI) is common problem in critically ill patients admitted in ICU leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Prokinetics, mainly erythromycin and metoclopramide have been used to address EFI in critically ill patients. This study was carried out to compare the efficacy of erythromycin plus metoclopramide and erythromycin alone for EFI in critically ill patients.

Method: Total 60 patients were enrolled for the study with 30 patients in group A (erythromycin plus metoclopramide) and group B (erythromycin). EFI was diagnosed when gastric residual volume (GRV) was >500ml. Rate of successful feeding at 48 hours, daily accumulative GRV, total daily calorie intake, hospital mortality and 28day mortality were recorded.

Results: The number of patients achieving successful feeding were significantly higher in group A (40%) than in group B (23.3%) at 72 – 96 hours. The ratio of average calorie intake to target calorie intake was also higher in group A (85.32 ± 20.61) than in group B (69.41 ± 35.86), (p = 0.039). Average GRV for the first six days was lower in group A then group B (p<0.05).

Conclusion: In critically ill patients, erythromycin plus metoclopramide is more effective than erythromycin alone in treating enteral feed intolerance.

Copyright & License

© 2025 The Author(s). Published by WM Journals.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Back to Current IssueArchive